The Magnum Opus: Dead SoulsThis is a featured page

Modern Book CoverGogol's Dead Souls, his first and only novel, is perhaps more important in a biographical and historical context than in simply a literary one. While the content of Dead Souls has its own resonance, according to Nabokov (the prime source of analysis on Gogol), and is pertinent to the development of Russian literature, the production of Dead Souls, with its intentions, aspirations, struggles, defeats and fiery end, has as much to be mined as the novel itself.

Gogol revered Pushkin in all senses of the word, and his admiration was such that he asked him for literary ideas. That Pushkin gave Gogol the idea for Dead Souls is not just a myth. It is fact. This link between two extremely important Russian writers of that age is indicative of a general sentiment towards the present state of their culture - one that strives both to articulate its illnesses as well as revive itself. What also occurred was Pushkin's response at having read a early draft of the first chapter, when he infamously exclaimed, "God, how sad our Russia is!". Gogol was dismayed by Pushkin's apparent lack of understanding, that somehow he had missed the point - that his characters were only caricatures. What Gogol may not have realized is that in itself is still tragic in its own right.

Critics now deem Dead Souls to be a 'mock -epic', but its during its conception Gogol's intention was to create the actual Russian Don Quixote, a Gogolian Odyssey. Ironically, it turned out to be Gogolian Hell - for himself, not only his attempts to mimick Dante's trilogy. Along with this vision, Gogol also considered Dead Souls to be an epic poem, or a novel in verse, as a title on the original cover indicates. Gogol also envisioned the trilogy to be the a part of the redemption of Russian society, transformative by example of the eventual redemption of Chichikov. And even with all this, Gogol saw the completion, or the victory, that this novel would bring as the solidifying fact verifying his creative genius. His overwhelming investment in this novel and the project it was to be was so closely linked with his creative self-conception that as it failed, he himself physically failed. Click here to read the biography.

A very brief summary of Dead Souls is as follows: The hero (anti-hero, Satan's cherub [as Nabokov likens him]) named Chichikov has developed a mysterious, genius, deriding and potentially blasphemous scheme: to buy up the dead 'souls' of peasants, using a government loophole in the tracking of serfs. When he has bought enough 'souls', he will take out a loan against them and quietly disappear into the countryside. And yes, all the implications that the phrase "dead souls" entails is present in the novel, so much so that at its original publication, the censors demanded the title be changed to "The Adventures of Chichikov".

While the overwhelming bleakness and ruefully subjective attitude all compound the cynicism for which Dead Souls is known, the real power of the novel is the opportunity for reformation, for light. The force most responsible for providing an answer to vacuum the text creates is humor. It provides the necessary distance from reality (as well does Gogol's insistence that Dead Souls is a poem) in a jolt, asking us to understand why laughter occurs. This method is both effective and heartbreaking and is a foil for the dismal nature of the novel.

Many critics have argued for the novel's importance in a social context. Its role as a critique of 19th century Russian society, as well as for critics looking back to the historical context of the time, is crucial. It is known as any and all of these labels: satirical, picaresque, mock-epic, novel-in-verse, and realistic. Interest in Dead Souls and its influence reignited during the modernist period, and many writers and artists, both Russian and otherwise, have found inspiration in Gogol and his works. Flannery O'Connor, the American Southern Gothic writer from the mid 20th century, looked to Gogol for the satirical depiction of a countryside filled with depraved caricatures of people, and through their grotesqueries, have the opportunity for redemption.

Gogol's burning of his later attempts to finish his epic trilogy apparently are not a great loss. Gogol could not continue with his re-envisioning of his 'negative types', and struggled to write a satisfactory 2nd or 3rd novel. His burning of most of his manuscript days before his death is infamous and as aptly metaphorical as it seems, and begs the question: who is not a 'dead soul' in this history?

Marc Chagall, Homage to Paul Cezanne


I shall laugh my bitter laugh


Epitaph on Gogol's tombstone



Other Links:
Dead Souls: First Chapter in Russian
Download text in English

Works Cited:
Further Reading and Bibliography
The Rise of Russian Literature by Richard Freeborn
Generic Biography
We All Love Wikipedia.



No user avatar
GogolGroup
Latest page update: made by GogolGroup , May 5 2009, 10:25 AM EDT (about this update About This Update GogolGroup Edited by GogolGroup

1 image added

view changes

- complete history)
Keyword tags: Dead Souls Novel
More Info: links to this page
There are no threads for this page.  Be the first to start a new thread.

Related Content

  (what's this?Related ContentThanks to keyword tags, links to related pages and threads are added to the bottom of your pages. Up to 15 links are shown, determined by matching tags and by how recently the content was updated; keeping the most current at the top. Share your feedback on Wetpaint Central.)